ambiguity by approaching the legalisation
At present I am disposed to drink
Whether or not the draft is
of bigamy.
that the words in question shows delities. In amended on this point, I am advised that it
my vein, however, it
is very important that every individual
in general leving.
affected should be told of the legislation
to milizoduce lequitation to ratedats these manager When this has been proposed and given an opportunity to make
done
I should lo
possible t
representations before the Ordinance is passed.llow this sarring
(b) The Home Office not infrequently issue provisional
orders, which are confirmed by Parliament, validating marriages, the validity of which is
enclose
doubtful. I attach a copy of one of these
orders for your information.
You will
observe that the names of the parties to
the marriage are not included in the Schedule,
for your consideration
and I would suggest therefore/that. the
Hong Kong draft Ordinance should be amended
so as to follow the Home Office practice. 3. Turning to the question of divorce decrees made by tire Chief Justice during internment,
as
provision would have any pradical offend
ENCLOSURE 1
Provisional Order 22/7/43
behind (17).
hagel you will see from the enclosed note, my Advisers agree that there is considerable doubt whether the Chief Justice possessed jurisdiction during that period. They see considerable objection, however, to the proposal that decrees made absolute by the Chief Justice should be regarded as void and that no action should be taken to validate them, if any of the parties
have
Porticularly if they hav concerned subsequently remarried and had children.
Buch
If, in fact, this was fee, then the children would
Jeer
not be legitimate if the decrees absolute was
voided
there is any such case it will obviously be necessary acess diar that it will
to enact legislation to remove all doubt as to the validity
I consider therefore that it is desirath of these decrees. tim inform the parties of the dous entiendamine on the matter
4.
is not the
гате
I am advised that there are greater objections
head to
te
in principle to validate decrees nisi which were
made in the Camp, and which, presumably, have not
a
that it is under
been
I introduces
and, according 6 Engle
lan
noth
would
legitimated
the subsequ K-mancays of
Ohvern parts. xaftis funther
dience
proceedings
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.